Mr. Birdsell, distinguished guests on the platform
and in the audience: I am very honored to participate in this ceremony
this morning and particularly so in view of the award which has just been
made by Tommy Johnson. Incidentally, as he stood there on that platform
before this illustrious audience in Beloit, I think the very poise that
he showed is an indication that the Boys' Clubs do a fine job - and certainly
he made us very proud of all the boys of America the way he handled that
situation. I know how he must have perhaps been looking forward to it because
people often say to me: "Do you ever get any tension before you make a
speech?" And the answer is: I remember when I was 13 and used to make a
little talk now and then I used to get a little tension, and the speeches
are never any good unless you are a little bit up to them, and I thought
Tommy did a wonderful job. Here's a future speaker. We can say that.
I have much that I could say about the Boys' Clubs,
their operations throughout the United States. As our national director,
Mr. Gleason, has indicated, I have participated in many ceremonies - in
Washington, in Miami, and in other cities around the country - having to
do with the Boys' Clubs of America, and I can say, first of all, to all
of those who have made this fine installation possible, I just don't know
of any contribution you could make to your community and to your Nation
which is more worthwhile and which in the long run will be more productive
of good than the one you have made to the Boys' Clubs of America.
You know this organization, certainly. You have
been reading in your local newspapers about its background and what it
is intended to accomplish in this community. I will not go into detail
on that particular point. I would like to make some observations, however,
with regard to what the Boys' Clubs and similar organizations like it tell
us about the special character of our American system.
I recall when we visited the Soviet Union my wife,
Pat, and I on one occasion had a chance to see a club. It was a boys' club.
It was called a Pioneer Camp. She went through several of them on this
trip. I saw the members of one. This was run by the Government. Now,
as far as the boys were concerned, they looked just like Tommy. They were
all in uniform. They ate the same things. They wore the same clothes. They
had absolutely no diversity whatever in choice as to what they would
do when they grew to manhood, and as far as the camps in which they lived
were concerned there was no problem of getting contributions from people
like yourselves who voluntarily select among the groups to which you want
to make contributions because it was all done by the Government. And sometimes
it must occur to you when the Boys' Clubs come one week and the Red Cross
the next and the YMCA the next and the Community Chest the next: Isn't
there a more efficient way of taking care of all these problems, of providing
boys' clubs and of contributing to Girl Scouts, for example. I am partial
to girls, of course, because we have girls in our family. And, yes, there
is a more efficient way to do it. We could do it as they do it in the totalitarian
countries. We could all be taxed for the purpose of having one central
direction by Government for the activities for our young people and for
all people who need assistance or to whom the Government should render
special services, but it would lose something. It would lose something
which the Boys' Clubs of America particularly stand for. It would be completely
impersonal. It would not develop boys like Tommy that we have seen here
today with great individuality. It would be an organization, in effect,
without a heart. If there is one thing about our great organizations like
the Boys' Clubs and similar ones throughout America - and literally there
are, of course, hundreds and perhaps thousands of organizations similar
to this one,
each making its own contribution in its own individual way to a better
life for our children - it is that such organizations, supported because
people have a heart, are not just mechanical; they are not just impersonal,
but they have a part in dealing with the problems of our young people.
This, I think, is something of which all of you can be immensely proud
today, that you have made it possible for boys in this community, from
all sectors of the economy, the rich boys, the poor boys, boys in this
community from all the various groups that are represented from the standpoint
of race, or creed or color, to come here to find a fine, constructive,
healthy atmosphere in which to spend their leisure time. That you have
made this possible is a great compliment to all of you who have participated
in this work.
I say to you today that you have not only helped
the boys of Beloit, but you have helped maintain something very precious
in the United States, and that is this approach to the problems that we
have in our country, which is nongovernment in character, which is voluntary
and which, therefore, can emphasize the individual rather than simply the
great impersonal state.
This does not mean, of course, the government, whether
it is Federal State or local, cannot and would not play a significant part
in activities designed to see that our young people have what has been
called an equal chance at the starting line or, since the baseball season
is about ending, we may not all be able to hit home runs, but we want our
turn at bat. Government must play apart in that. Our schools that are supported
by taxes play a significant part in that. But organizations like this can
play a part that government simply is incapable of playing, and that is
why I was particularly happy to be able to leave the campaign trail for
these few minutes, to spend them with you, to pay a tribute to you and
to pay a tribute also to this organization which is headed by Mr. Hoover
and which is represented by Mr. Glean today.
I would add just one final thought: As we
look into the future, as we consider this great struggle in which we're
engaged with the forces of totalitarianism on one side and the forces of
freedom on the other side, one of those factors which makes me confident
of its outcome is what I see here today, the fact that our people - and
this is true of people everywhere if they are given a chance - will support
an organization, not because it's going to do you some good, not for any
selfish motive, but because it's the right thing to do, because you are
interested in the boys, not just your own boys, but you're interested in
all the boys in this community.
And I might suggest if we could relate this
to the great meeting going on at the United Nations in New York today,
if we could relate it to the difference in approach between the United
States as represented by President Eisenhower and the Soviet Union as represented
by Chairman Khrushchev, this same characteristic stands out. We hear about
our foreign-aid programs and theirs. We sometimes perhaps get the idea
that this is just a contest in which each is trying to outbid the other,
in Africa, in Asia, in Latin America, for the support of these peoples,
but let me say that what gives the United States and the free nations an
advantage, the reason that in the long run we will prevail, is that, not
only through government, but through private organizations and private
contributions like CARE, the people of the United States would be willing
and have been willing from the time of their foundation to help the people
of other countries who need help - not because we're fighting communism,
not because we're fighting for something selfish for ourselves, but because
it's the right thing to do, because if there were no communism in the
world there would still be hungry people. If there were no communism
in the world there would still be slavery and the denial of freedom. And
if there were no communism in the world, with these things existing, we
would care, as a people, as a nation.
So, that's a far cry, it seems, from the Boys'
Club dedication here in Beloit, but actually the same great principle works
here; and so, I say to you: Thank you for helping to keep alive in this
community, in this State, in this Nation, this great concept of helping
people not because it helps ourselves, but because it's the right thing
to do. This principle joins us together. This principle is one that certainly
unites all Americans, regardless of the very small differences - and they
are very small - that we may have on the basis of religion or creed or
anything else. It is also the principle that unites men of good will throughout
the world, and it is because America, in a community like this, in a State,
in a Nation and in its foreign policy, stands for this principle that we
can have faith that these grave international problems will be solved with
peace and that freedom will prevail throughout the world.
Thank you.