Here in California a few days ago Senator Kennedy
proposed the establishment of a so-called peace corps. In doing so he was
appealing to one of the higher aspirations of our Nation - that of serving
not ourselves alone, but also the peoples of other nations.
But the plan he proposed for achieving this
objective is superficial and obviously concocted solely for campaign purposes.
If put into effect it would be harmful both to the Selective Service and
to those so ably representing the U.S. abroad.
The proposal he makes is to say in effect
to young men who are eligible for the draft, "if you will volunteer for
a peace corps you can evade your obligations under the Selective Service
and Training Act."
Thus he proposes to undermine our Selective
Service System by providing an "escape hatch" for those who do not want
to serve in the Armed Forces. This would ultimately bring the whole system
into disrepute. It would set up an "elite" corps who would be excused from
military duties. This would be a class distinction completely alien to
our heritage - a class distinction that would cause great resentment.
Insofar as serving the peoples of other nations
is concerned he proposes to send America's representatives to other nations
young men, whom he calls volunteers but who, in truth in many instances
would be trying to escape the draft. Instead of sending to these nations
young men and women who are genuinely eager to dedicate their lives to
the service of others, Mr. Kennedy would cater to draft evasion. He would
develop a "cult of escapism."
Here is another example of Mr. Kennedy's fast
and flashy technique of proposing a program that looks good on the surface
- but which is inherently dangerous. The Presidency is no place for a man
who acts first and thinks later.
I favor having the Federal Government take
vigorous action to recruit an increasing number of our people, young and
not so young, who are willing to serve in underdeveloped countries. We
need men and women who have a sense of mission - men and women who are
committed to the objective of helping other peoples to achieve their highest
potential. It would be a tragic mistake to include those whose primary
objective is to escape the draft.
One of the first orders of business for me
after January 20, 1961, would be to forward to the Congress a series of
recommendations that would increase the effectiveness of our recruiting
programs for service abroad, provide more adequate training facilities
for those going abroad, and provide improved incentives for making a career
out of such service.
Our people will respond to such a program.
Certainly we do not have to wreck our whole concept of a sound Selective
Service System and place alongside our dedicated career Foreign Service
persons evading the draft in order to carry the fight for freedom and peace
into the underdeveloped nations.