Last minute opposition tactics are becoming
more and more desperate.
Yesterday, in Amarillo, Mr. Kennedy charged
me with using what he called "the blackmailer's tactic" in dealing with
the farm problem.
By now my opponent has obviously decided to
bury his own fantastic farm program and, instead, to fill the air with
ominous sounding countercharges.
What does he object to?
He objects to my indictment of his farm program
as threatening intolerable bureaucratic controls on our farmers and ranchers,
and of raising the price of food by 25 percent. He says this sets city
against country.
He is the one who, if he gets his way, would
set city against country.
I did not dream up this indictment.
Career experts of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
objectively analyzed his proposals - as he himself said in Sioux Falls,
S. Dak., they could do "without difficulty" - and made public a report
setting forth their conclusions.
I have challenged him to disprove it. He has
not done so. He cannot, because it is based on hard, real analysis.
Nor is this the only evidence available to
the American people.
Henry A. Wallace, Secretary of Agriculture
under President Franklin D. Roosevelt - and certainly no political ally
of mine - says that the Kennedy farm plan will result in controls on farmers
stricter than those imposed in many Communist countries.
Why will the Kennedy farm plan mean police-state
type controls?
The 60 percent of American agriculture that
has, until now, been virtually free would be brought under rigid control
of Washington deskbound farmers and ranchers.
That means controls on cattlemen and other
agricultural producers here in Wyoming and elsewhere.
A slashing of 20 percent of U.S. agricultural
marketings would have to be carried out under the Kennedy farm plan. That
would include a 14- to 17-percent cutback in marketings of cattle and calves.
It would mean a 38- to 46-percent cutback in wheat, and so on down the
line.
The experts flatly say that under the Kennedy
farm plan, a million jobs would be cut out of the farm and another million
lost in the towns and cities by workers who transport, process, and handle
crops.
The experts further say that to carry out
the Kennedy farm plan would require an additional 50,000 Federal inspectors
to enforce the new controls on our farms and ranches. Penalties would have
to be severe and jail sentences would zoom for noncompliance.
Another prospective effect of all this on
the price of food - say the experts - is to jump the price of food by 25
percent.
These are the facts Mr. Kennedy objects to
hearing and to having you hear.
This is what farm and ranch people ought to
know about this totalitarian farm plan. This is what consumers ought to
know about it.
I challenge him again - as I have for weeks
- to defend his farm folly, or forget it.
The American people are waiting.