Thank you very much.
Congressman Kearns, this great crowd here
at the airport in Erie, we thank you for making this one of the great rallies
of the campaign here in Erie, Pa.
I want to say, first, that this is, for me,
a special occasion from a personal standpoint, and I know you won't mind
the personal reference in the last week of this campaign. Fourteen years
ago Pat and I came to Washington as freshmen, and I met there a Congressman
from this district, Carroll Kearns. For 14 years I have worked with him.
We were both members of the Education and Labor Committee. You have been
sending him back for seven terms. I just want to say this one thing about
him: Among his friends and neighbors, and constituents here, the thing
that always impresses you about Carroll is that he has such a deep affection
for people. He's a man of great heart. Whether it was working on education,
whether it was working in the field of health, whether it was working in
the field of labor legislation, he was a fair man. But, above all, he was
thinking of his people at home - and I am proud to be associated with him.
I'm proud of the splendid work he did on the Labor-Management Act of 1959,
which has been a fair act, protecting the interests of union members, as
well as the interests of the general public.
So, with that, I am proud to be here, and
I ask for the biggest majority Carroll Kearns has ever had in the district
of Erie in this election campaign.
Now I realize that you folks up here in this
country are pretty hardy, and when that breeze comes off Lake Erie, it
doesn't bother you too much. But certainly the fact that some of you have
come, the fact that you would be standing here, jammed in like this, indicates
that you know here in Erie what a tremendous decision, a tremendously important
decision, you will be making on November the 8th, just 1 week from today.
I realize that in this audience are members
of my party. I realize there are members of the other party. I realize
that there are people who have not yet made up their minds as to how to
vote. And I want to ask you today, my friends, to do this: only 1 week
remains before you make the most important decision of your life.
I ask you, as you listen to me talk, to think
not in terms of your party. Think in terms of what we need for America,
and that will be best for you and best for all the people of this country.
Because, my friends, what I stand for is bigger
than my party. It's the cause of peace and freedom for the world. It's
the cause of progress without war here at home. What I stand for, I believe,
commands and will have the support not only of my Republican friends, but
of millions of Democrats and independents who realize that what we stand
for and not what my opponent stands for, is what America needs in this
critical period.
Now let me put it directly in terms which
all of us will understand and appreciate. First at home: Did you realize
that when you cast your vote next Tuesday you're casting a vote for the
prices you will pay for everything you buy; you're casting a vote for the
taxes you'll pay, whether you want them increased or whether you want them
held in check; you're casting a vote for the foreign policy of this country,
whether you want to continue the kind of leadership that got America out
of one war and has kept it out of others, and has given us peace without
surrender today, or whether you want to turn this country over to untried,
inexperienced, impulsive, rash leadership, such as our opponent offers.
Now let me be specific. Let's take prices.
I know something about prices. Let me put it in terms I understand. I grew
up in a grocery store. I remember how the housewives used to come in, how
they would shop for the bargains - and they had to, because when they could
get hamburger rather than the beef roast they would have preferred, it
might have made the difference in balancing the budget that week.
I remember how the thrifty housewives had
to make those decisions every day, and I know the prices you pay for your
groceries can make or break the family budget of millions of Americans,
including thousands right here in this audience today.
Now what has this got to do with electing
a President of the United States? Simply this: my opponent offers a farm
program, which is the most radical farm program from the standpoint of
the farmers and from the standpoint of the consumers ever offered to the
American people. It's even more radical than anything Harry Truman ever
thought of - and, believe me, that's going some, if you know what I mean.
Now what will that farm program do? As far
as the farmers are concerned, it will put a million of them out of business
by cutting acreage. It will put 50,000 new Federal police inspectors
on the farms of this country to see that the farmer grows what he's told,
sells it at the amount he's told, does nothing unless he's told to do it
by the Government. But you know what it does to you? It harms the farmer,
because the farmer will find that he grows less, even though he will get
more for that less. But as far as the people are concerned, let me tell
you what it does. It will raise the price of every quart of milk by 4 cents.
It will raise the price of every dozen of eggs by 28 cents. It will raise
the price of every pound of butter by 25 cents.
I could go on and on and on. And you say,
"Well, Mr. Nixon, it couldn't." Listen, I am a candidate for President.
I have studied this thing through. These are not my figures. They are the
figures of the career employees of the Department of Agriculture, not the
political appointees. They have studied this plan and they say the Kennedy
farm plan, if it goes into effect, will raise the prices in the grocery
store of everything you buy by 25 percent - and I say: do you want that?
Can you afford it?
Well, I'll tell you, you're not going to get
it, because he's not going to win. We're going to win on November the 8th.
Now let me go further. I've been talking about
prices in the grocery store. There are also other kinds of prices you will
be voting for with your vote on November the 8th.
My friends, you know, people sometimes come
to me and they say, "Mr. Nixon, why is it that you don't outpromise your
opponent? Why is it that you don't do what he does? He goes all around
the country and promises this and that, and says, 'I'll spend so many billions
for this and so many billions for that.' After all, if that's what the
people want, maybe that's the way to get elected"
You know why I don't do it? Because I know
it's wrong. You know why I don't do it? Because I know that when I make
a promise, I'm not going to pay for it, but you're going to pay for it.
And that's true of his promises, too. It's your money that's going to be
paying for those promises.
Let me put it right down in terms again that
I understand and that you understand, and, believe me, I have a feeling
for these problems, because I've been through them. I've grown up with
them. I know my mother and my father, how they had to save and put five
boys through school and to pay for all the illnesses we had, because we
had many when we were growing up, particularly my older brother. And I
know that under the circumstances, it is the duty of the President of the
United States to do everything that he can, to spend in Washington those
things that are necessary to move us forward, but not to spend a dollar
that the people can better spend at home.
So, what do we find? My opponent has programs
that would cost you - now, listen to this - $15 billion a year more each
year. You know how much money that is? That's almost the entire gold reserve
of the United States.
Let's put it in terms we can better understand.
You know what that means? That means higher taxes, higher prices for all
the American people; one or the other - or both.
"Now, just a minute," some of you say. "Didn't
I read in the paper where Senator Kennedy said a couple of days ago that
he was against highertaxes?"
Yes, you read that.
"Didn't I read in the paper a couple of days
ago where he said that he was for a balanced budget?"
Yes; you read that. But, my friends let's
get it down in simple economics. You can't be for programs that would add
$15 billion to our budget and also be for keeping the budget balanced in
Washington without raising taxes.
In other words, you can't be against raising
taxes, for a balanced budget, and for spending $15 billion a year, all
at the same time; and anybody who says you can do all those things shows
a lack of understanding of economics so low that he is disqualified from
being President of the United States in my opinion.
Let me put it this way. You know, I suppose
for Senator Kennedy this is not a difficult problem. He's never had to
worry about where the money was going to come from. But I know money doesn't
grow on trees, and he should know it, too. And I say to him today, and
I challenge him: tell the American people what taxes he is going to raise,
what prices are going to be raised, or tell them what part of his program
and his promises he's going to give up, because, my friends, this pie in
the sky has got to be paid for.
Now, what is our alternative? I'll tell you
what it is. We offer the greatest program of progress ever offered in an
American campaign. And it's the greatest because we can keep our promises,
keep them without raising. prices, without raising taxes, keep, them with
all Americans movng forward together, with none being left behind.
Let me give you some examples. There has been
a lot of talk about depressed areas, and I am glad to have an opportunity
to lay to rest and lay out cold here today some disgraceful charges which
have been made with regard to our program.
Do you know what happened? Five different
times the President has tried to get the Democratic Congress to pass a
bill that would deal with these problems. Five different times they have
acted, but when they have acted, they have acted irresponsibly. And you
say, "prove it." You know, they've been talking about the bill the President
vetoed. I'll tell you why he vetoed it - because it wouldn't have helped
Erie. I'll tell you why. The bill the President wants would have provided
twice as much money for Erie, a real depressed area, and the other depressed
areas we are speaking of, than the bills the Democrats, the Democratic
Congress and Senator Kennedy, have suggested.
Let me go on to one other subject. I have
been speaking of domestic problems. There's another one. It is more important
than all the rest.
Carroll, you remember when I was here in 1952.
You were just remarking about it. Do you remember the situation then? Let's
think back a moment. A war in Korea - 160,000 casualties. You remember
the situation then. Now, they've been talking about the foreign policy
of this administration. And they say it's been a policy of defeat and retreat.
My friends, if they're talking about a policy
of defeat and retreat, the only thing wrong is that Senator Kennedy is
talking about the wrong administration. He meant Truman, not Eisenhower.
You remember what happened? Six hundred million
people lost to communism in the Truman years.
You remember what happened. A war in Korea
brought about by a foolish, naive lack of understanding of dictators, of
communism, inviting the very attack which came. And may I say that we're
not going to go back to that kind of policy. We're going to go forward
with the kind of leadership that President Eisenhower has given - firmness,
strength, and never surrendering freedom any place in the world at the
point of a gun. And I say to you, my friends, that is the road to peace.
You know, it's so easy for somebody to get
up and say, "Oh, Mr. Nixon, why don't we give this away to the Communists?
Why don't we give them this, because we don't want a war?"
My friends, we learned in dealing with Hitler;
we've learned in dealing with Stalin. We're learning now in dealing with
Khrushchev, with Mao Tse-tung, that when you deal with a dictator the way
to war is paved with that kind of wishful, woolly thinking, with the kind
of thinking which surrenders territory to them. Why? Because they don't
want just a couple of islands. They don't want just Korea or Formosa. They
want the world. And, wanting the world, every time you turn something over,
it whets their appetite and they would demand more - and Americans will
die for that kind of policy.
Cabot Lodge and I, I can assure you, know
the Communists. We know Mr. Khrushchev. We would never make the mistake
that was made in Korea. We will keep America strong, and we will keep the
peace without surrender, and that's what we ask for in this campaign -
the opportunity to do exactly that.
My final point: What is your choice, then,
in the field of foreign policy ?
You know us. You know the experience we have,
and you also have an idea what our opponent would do. He disagreed with
the President on the Formosa Straits. He disagreed with the President on
the summit conference, saying he could have apologized or expressed regrets
to Khrushchev. You know what Khrushchev would have done had the President
or Senator Kennedy done that? If Senator Kennedy had been President and
had gone up and apologized for those flights, he would have run over him
like a steam roller. I know this man. He's tough. He's resourceful. He
is ruthless, and the last thing you must do is to make a concession without
getting one in return. That's the way to peace with him - peace through
strength, peace through firmness, not through the kind of woolly, wishful
thinking that Senator Kennedy has indicated.
And then the Cuban situation. Do you recall
that, where he advocated a policy which all the papers in the country,
including those which endorsed him, said amounted to intervention in Cuba?
What would that have meant? A civil war there. What would that have meant?
Inviting the Communists in - and all of this, of course, in violation of
treaties we have.
Of course, I realize there are those who say:
"Just a minute. Didn't he take back all those things?" That's right. He's
tried to. But, you know, when you're President, you don't have the chance
to take it back. When you're a candidate, you can make a statement and
change it tomorrow. But when you're President and you make a decision,
it's done. It's for keeps.
My friends, can we afford to use the White
House as a training school for a man who wants to learn how to be President
at the expense of the United States of America?
Well, there is your choice. I do not suggest,
as I conclude, that all of the problems of this world are going to be easy
if we're elected, but I do say this: We know these problems. We have dealt
with them, and we pledge to you that America will move forward at home,
as she has never moved before. We pledge to you that America will move
forward abroad without war, extending freedom, extending it to the people
behind the Iron Curtain, giving hope to the people in Poland and all the
slave countries. And we, above everything else, pledge to you, if you will
give us a chance, that we will try to be worthy of America.
On that count, just let me state my view about
America. . We've been hearing a lot of things wrong about this country
- our science is second-rate; our education is second-rate; we have the
worst slums; we have the most crowded people; our people lack a sense of
purpose; we're only interested in tailfins and deodorants and the materialistic
things.
Listen, I have seen the people of America.
My campaign will have been the most intensive in history. I will have visited
every one of the 50 States by the end of this week, and I've looked into
the faces of thousands of people like this all over America. I have seen
the churches of America, the schools of America, the homes of America.
And, my friends, we're a great, people - a great people because we believe
in the right things, not because we're rich, not because we're strong,
but because we stand for peace and don't want anything from anybody else
except independence for them and for us; because we believe in God, because
we have faith in the rights of men and belief that those rights belong
to all people.
We're a great people, and I only hope that
we, Cabot Lodge and I, can be worthy of the great American people in these
years ahead.
Thank you.