Mr. Nixon's contention that the hard-hit unemployment
areas of the country would have received more help under the administration
area redevelopment bill than under the Douglas-Flood bill, which I supported
and which President Eisenhower vetoed, is patently absurd.
The Vice President is reported to have said
in Scranton, Pa., yesterday, that the Scranton area would have received
$1.5 million under the administration bill compared to less than $1 million
under the Democratic bill; and that the Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton area would
have received $2.6 million compared to $1.6 million under the Democratic
bill.
Mr. Nixon did not explain how he derived his
figures, but he did say that the administration program would have provided
$180 million in aid. These figures do not agree with the public record.
The administration bill considered by the Congress this year provided only
$53 million. After the Democratic bill was vetoed, the administration did
propose another bill, which appeared to be a political maneuver rather
than a serious legislative proposal. Even this bill provided only $80 million.
The Democratic bill that was vetoed provided
assistance totaling $251 million - or almost 5 times the $53 million proposed
by the administration.
While it is true that the Democratic program
would have made more areas eligible, it is clear that five times as much
money can be spread five times as far. Five times as much money will help
five times as many people; create five times as many jobs.
No one can say, moreover, not even Mr. Nixon,
how much money any one community would get under any of the proposed bills.
Broad discretion would have been granted the administrator under any bill,
and certainly the communities which are hardest hit would have been given
a priority.
The fact is that the Vice President must still
try to explain two vetoes of legislation which would have brought help
to America's depressed areas. The people of those areas were injured by
those vetoes, and no amount of arithmetical doubletalk can conceal that
essential truth.