Memorandum to the Heads of Departments and Agencies:
On several occasions I have
emphasized the importance of actions to limit the number of Federal employees
to the absolute minimum necessary to get the public business done. We can
accomplish this objective only if strong efforts are made by every department
and agency head to achieve increases in productivity and efficiency, to
use better techniques of management, and to add staff only on the basis
of demonstrated need to carry out essential activities.
Congress has now enacted legislation,
along the lines of the proposal made to the Congress last January, to provide
pay scales more nearly to the level of those prevailing in the private
economy. I am confident that this will reduce turnover, attract more capable
people into the Federal Service, and improve employee morale. It will thus
make a direct and substantial contribution to increased productivity. An
added obligation is therefore placed on the executive branch to make certain
that essential programs are carried out with the minimum of personnel.
It is most important to recognize
that responsibility for manpower control and utilization in the Federal
Government rests squarely on the top management of each agency. Without
your continuing attention and support, it will not be possible to hold
new requests for personnel to bedrock levels, to abolish marginal jobs,
and to increase employee productivity. Where rules, regulations, or laws
restrict you in carrying out this objective, I will expect you to make
these facts known promptly and to suggest solutions.
Employment needs are decreased
as productivity rises and as ongoing programs can be reduced or terminated.
At the same time it is recognized that new programs or expansion of existing
programs will result in increased employment, to the extent that increased
manpower needs cannot be offset by greater productivity. It is essential
that employment plans be scrutinized at every level to make sure that every
opportunity for decreases is seized and increases, where necessary, are
held to an absolute minimum. This is vital not only because civilian salaries
account for a substantial part of the Federal budget, but equally important
- especially in such fields as engineering, science, and medicine - because
the Federal Government is competing for a scarce supply of manpower. The
best utilization of manpower is therefore important not only to keep budget
costs down but to maximize our national security and our economic growth.
I have recently completed a
review of our present system for determining manpower requirements and
for holding the number of Federal employees to a minimum. To strengthen
the Government's manpower control program, I have directed that the following
actions be taken:
1. Detailed employment plans
as well as expenditure plans will be submitted by each Department and Agency
in connection with the annual budget review.
2. Such plans will be expected
to reflect increases in employee productivity - that is, it is to be expected
that the same amount of work will be performed by increasingly fewer people,
and the number of employees will not increase proportionately with increases
in programs.
3. The Bureau of the Budget
will give increased scrutiny to these employment plans and keep me informed.
In addition, the Bureau will strengthen and update present instructions
to the departments and agencies concerning the establishment of adequate
machinery and methods to increase efficiency and hold down employment.
4. Each Department and Agency
will be required to submit to the Bureau of the Budget for review at an
early date its over-all program for manpower control and manpower utilization.
I expect each department and agency head to give personal attention to
this matter.
5. All agencies are requested
to undertake increased efforts to search out and apply the most modern
and effective means used in either Government of private industry to increase
efficiency and output. There are many cases where such productivity has
increased rapidly in recent years - the Internal Revenue Service, the Customs
Bureau, the Census Bureau, the Passport Office, and many other parts of
Government can be cited as good illustrations. I should like these efforts
broadened and expanded. Central research to assist in this effort will
be conducted by the Bureau of the Budget and the Civil Service Commission.
As an illustration, the Bureau has undertaken, in cooperation with several
agencies, a research and demonstration project in five different units
of Government to develop methods for measuring over-all agency productivity
and for using such measures for improved manpower control.
6. The Bureau of the Budget,
the Civil Service Commission, and the departments and agencies will undertake
a systematic program of manpower inspections and reviews. The priority
and scheduling of these inspections will be worked out under the leadership
of the Bureau of the Budget, and will be carried out by staff of the Bureau,
the Commission, and the agency concerned. The special inquiries into manpower
utilization practices currently made by the Civil Service Commission will
become a part of this new program. The inspections will be made on a selective
basis which will give priority attention to areas where the most significant
problems and potential savings exist. While every agency cannot be reviewed
each year, it may be desirable to review certain agencies annually or more
frequently. The inspections will be designed to test the effectiveness
of agency systems for manpower analysis and control, and to assist the
departments and agencies in discovering opportunities for better use of
manpower resources that are available. The results of these reviews will
be reported to the head of each agency promptly, for immediate attention
and such action as is necessary. I have asked to be kept informed of the
findings and recommendations that are made, and the action taken.
7. The Congress, in enacting
the Postal Service and Federal Employee Salary Act of 1962, included a
provision that "the departments, agencies, establishments, and corporations
in the executive branch shall absorb the costs of the increases in basic
compensation provided by this Act to the fullest extent possible without
seriously affecting the immediate execution of essential functions."
It further provides that the "heads of the executive branch activities
concerned are directed to review with meticulous care each vacancy resulting
from voluntary resignations, retirement, or death, and to determine whether
the duties of the position can be reassigned to other employees or whether
the position can be abolished without seriously affecting the execution
of essential functions." I am in full agreement with this statement of
policy and will look to the Director of the Bureau of the Budget to advise
me with respect to the observance of this policy in connection with any
supplemental appropriations required to carry out that Act.
I regard the program outlined
in this memorandum as of the highest importance to good management in the
executive branch. If we carry it out firmly, I am confident that productivity
in the Federal Government can continue to keep pace with the growth of
productivity in the private sector of the economy. Such an accomplishment
would translate into tens of thousands of Federal jobs that either could
be eliminated or would not have to be added to the present numbers.
I am sure that these measures
and objectives will have your strong personal support.