Mr. President, Governor Brown, Dr. Pauley, Chancellor,
members of the Board of Regents, members of the faculty and fellow students,
ladies and gentlemen:
The last time that I came to
this Stadium was 22 years ago, when I visited it in November of 1940 as
a student at a nearby small school for the game with Stanford. And we got
a - I must say I had a much warmer reception today than I did from my Coast
friends here on that occasion. In those days we used to fill these universities
for football, and now we do it for academic events, and I'm not sure that
this doesn't represent a rather dangerous trend for the future of our country.
I am delighted to be here on
this occasion for though it is the 94th anniversary of the Charter, in
a sense this is the hundredth anniversary. For this university and so many
other universities across our country owe their birth to the most extraordinary
piece of legislation which this country has ever adopted, and that is the
Morrill Act, signed by President Abraham Lincoln in the darkest and most
uncertain days of the Civil War, which set before the country the opportunity
to build the great land-grant colleges, of which this is so distinguished
a part. Six years later, this university obtained its Charter.
In its first graduating class
it included a future Governor of California, a future Congressman, a judge,
a State assemblyman, a clergyman, a lawyer, a doctor - all in a graduating
class of 12 students!
This college, therefore, from
its earliest beginnings, has recognized, and its graduates have recognized,
that the purpose of education is not merely to advance the economic self-interest
of its graduates. The people of California, as much if not more than the
people of any other State, have supported their colleges and their universities
and their schools, because they recognize how important it is to the maintenance
of a free society that its citizens be well educated.
"Every man," said Professor
Woodrow Wilson, "sent out from a university should be a man of his nation
as well as a man of his time."
And Prince Bismarck was even
more specific. One third, he said, of the students of German universities
broke down from overwork, another third broke down from dissipation, and
the other third ruled Germany.
I do not know which third of
students are here today, but I am confident that I am talking to the future
leaders of this State and country who recognize their responsibilities
to the public interest.
Today you carry on that tradition.
Our distinguished and courageous Secretary of Defense, our distinguished
Secretary of State, the Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, the Director
of the CIA and others, all are graduates of this University. It is a disturbing
fact to me, and it may be to some of you, that the New Frontier owes as
much to Berkeley as it does to Harvard University.
This has been a week of momentous
events around the world. The long and painful struggle in Algeria which
comes to an end. Both nuclear powers and neutrals labored at Geneva for
a solution to the problem of a spiraling arms race, and also to the problems
that so vex our relations with the Soviet Union. The Congress opened hearings
on a trade bill, which is far more than a trade bill, but an opportunity
to build a stronger and closer Atlantic Community. And my wife had her
first and last ride on an elephant!
But history may well remember
this as a week for an act of lesser immediate impact, and that is the decision
by the United States and the Soviet Union to seek concrete agreements on
the joint exploration of space. Experience has taught us that an agreement
to negotiate does not always mean a negotiated agreement. But should such
a joint effort be realized, its significance could well be tremendous for
us all. In terms of space science, our combined knowledge and efforts can
benefit the people of all the nations: joint weather satellites to provide
more ample warnings against destructive storms - joint communications systems
to draw the world more closely together - and cooperation in space medicine
research and space tracking operations to speed the day when man will go
to the moon and beyond.
But the scientific gains from
such a joint effort would offer, I believe, less realized return than the
gains for world peace. For a cooperative Soviet-American effort in space
science and exploration would emphasize the interests that must unite us,
rather than those that always divide us. It offers us an area in which
the stale and sterile dogmas of the cold war could be literally left a
quarter of a million miles behind. And it would remind us on both sides
that knowledge, not hate, is the passkey to the future - that knowledge
transcends national antagonisms - that it speaks a universal language -
that it is the possession, not of a single class, or of a single nation
or a single ideology, but of all mankind.
I need hardly emphasize the
happy pursuit of knowledge in this place. Your faculty includes more Nobel
laureates than any other faculty in the world - more in this one community
than our principal adversary has received since the awards began in 1901.
And we take pride in that, only from a national point of view, because
it indicates, as the Chancellor pointed out, the great intellectual benefits
of a free society. This University of California will continue to grow
as an intellectual center because your presidents and your chancellors
and your professors have rigorously defended that unhampered freedom of
discussion and inquiry which is the soul of the intellectual enterprise
and the heart of a free university.
We may be proud as a nation
of our record in scientific achievement - but at the same time we must
be impressed by the interdependence of all knowledge. I am certain that
every scholar and scientist here today would agree that his own work has
benefited immeasurably from the work of the men and women in other countries.
The prospect of a partnership with Soviet scientists in the exploration
of space opens up exciting prospects of collaboration in other areas of
learning. And cooperation in the pursuit of knowledge can hopefully lead
to cooperation in the pursuit of peace.
Yet the pursuit of knowledge
itself implies a world where men are free to follow out the logic of their
own ideas. It implies a world where nations are free to solve their own
problems and to realize their own ideals. It implies, in short, a world
where collaboration emerges from the voluntary decisions of nations strong
in their own independence and their own self-respect. It implies, I believe,
the kind of world which is emerging before our eyes - the world produced
by the revolution of national independence which has today, and has been
since 1945, sweeping across the face of the world.
I sometimes think that we are
too much impressed by the clamor of daily events. The newspaper headlines
and the television screens give us a short view. They so flood us with
the stop-press details of daily stories that we lose sight of one of the
great movements of history. Yet it is the profound tendencies of history
and not the passing excitements, that will shape our future.
The short view gives us the
impression as a nation of being shoved and harried, everywhere on the defense.
But this impression is surely an optical illusion. From the perspective
of Moscow, the world today may seem ever more troublesome, more intractable,
more frustrating than it does to us. The leaders of the Communist world
are confronted not only by acute internal problems in each Communist country
- the failure of agriculture, the rising discontent of the youth and the
intellectuals, the demands of technical and managerial groups for status
and security. They are confronted in addition by profound divisions within
the Communist world itself - divisions which have already shattered the
image of Communism as a universal system guaranteed to abolish all social
and international conflicts - the most valuable asset the Communists had
for many years.
Wisdom requires the long view.
And the long view shows us that the revolution of national independence
is a fundamental fact of our era. This revolution will not be stopped.
As new nations emerge from the oblivion of centuries, their first aspiration
is to affirm their national identity. Their deepest hope is for a world
where, within a framework of international cooperation, every country can
solve its own problems according to its own traditions and ideals.
It is in the interests of the
pursuit of knowledge - and it is in our own national interest - that this
revolution of national independence succeed. For the Communists rest everything
on the idea of a monolithic world - a world where all knowledge has a single
pattern, all societies move toward a single model, and all problems and
roads have a single solution and a single destination. The pursuit of knowledge,
on the other hand, rests everything on the opposite idea - on the idea
of a world based on diversity, self-determination, freedom. And that is
the kind of world to which we Americans, as a nation, are committed by
the principles upon which the great Republic was founded.
As men conduct the pursuit of
knowledge, they create a world which freely unites national diversity and
international partnership. This emerging world is incompatible with the
Communist world order. It will irresistibly burst the bonds of the Communist
organization and the Communist ideology. And diversity and independence,
far from being opposed to the American conception of world order, represent
the very essence of our view of the future of the world.
There used to be so much talk
a few years ago about the inevitable triumph of communism. We hear such
talk much less now. No one who examines the modern world can doubt that
the great currents of history are carrying the world away from the monolithic
idea towards the pluralistic idea - away from communism and towards national
independence and freedom. No one can doubt that the wave of the future
is not the conquest of the world by a single dogmatic creed but the liberation
of the diverse energies of free nations and free men. No one can doubt
that cooperation in the pursuit of knowledge must lead to freedom of the
mind and freedom of the soul.
Beyond the drumfire of daily
crisis, therefore, there is arising the outlines of a robust and vital
world community, founded on nations secure in their own independence, and
united by allegiance to world peace. It would be foolish to say that this
world will be won tomorrow, or the day after. The processes of history
are fitful and uncertain and aggravating. There will be frustrations and
setbacks. There will be times of anxiety and gloom. The specter of thermonuclear
war will continue to hang over mankind; and we must heed the advice of
Oliver Wendell Holmes of "freedom leaning on her spear" until all nations
are wise enough to disarm safely and effectively.
Yet we can have a new confidence
today in the direction in which history is moving. Nothing is more stirring
than the recognition of great public purpose. Every great age is marked
by innovation and daring - by the ability to meet unprecedented problems
with intelligent solutions. In a time of turbulence and change, it is more
true than ever that knowledge is power; for only by true understanding
and steadfast judgment are we able to master the challenge of history.
If this is so, we must strive
to acquire knowledge - and to apply it with wisdom. We must reject over-simplified
theories of international life - the theory that American power is unlimited,
or that the American mission is to remake the world in the American image.
We must seize the vision of a free and diverse world - and shape our policies
to speed progress toward a more flexible world order.
This is the unifying spirit
of our policies in the world today. The purpose of our aid programs must
be to help developing countries move forward as rapidly as possible on
the road to genuine national independence. Our military policies must assist
nations to protect the processes of democratic reform of the Presidents
and development against disruption and intervention. Our diplomatic policies
must strengthen our relations with the whole world, with our several alliances
and within the United Nations.
As we press forward on every
front to realize a flexible world order, the role of the university becomes
ever more important, both as a reservoir of ideas and as a repository of
the long view of the shore dimly seen.
"Knowledge is the great sun
of the firmament," said Senator Daniel Webster. "Life and power are scattered
with all its beams."
In its light, we must think
and act not only for the moment but for our time. I am reminded of the
story of the great French Marshal Lyautey, who once asked his gardener
to plant a tree. The gardener objected that the tree was slow-growing and
would not reach maturity for a hundred years. The Marshal replied, "In
that case, there is no time to lose, plant it this afternoon."
Today a world of knowledge -
a world of cooperation - a just and lasting peace - may be years away.
But we have no time to lose. Let us plant our trees this afternoon.