Statement by the President on Receiving
Report on Automation
by the Advisory Committee on Labor-Management
Policy.
January 11, 1962
I APPRECIATE greatly the contribution this report represents.
This automation problem is as
important as any we face.
We must take advantage of every
opportunity for technological development. But we cannot disregard the
human values involved.
Your recommendations properly
recognize both sides of this problem. I am grateful for your help.
NOTE: The Committee's first report, dated January 11
and entitled "The Benefits and Problems Incident to Automation and Other
Technological Advances" (25 pp., processed), was released with the President's
statement. It was presented to the President at the White House by the
Chairman, Secretary of Labor Arthur J. Goldberg, and the Vice Chairman,
Secretary of Commerce Luther H. Hodges, accompanied by members of the 19-man
Committee. (For establishment see 1961 volume, this series, Item
40.)
The Committee's recommendations
cover the following matters:
1. Adoption of policies to promote
a high rate of economic growth and fuller utilization of resources.
2. Collection and dissemination
of information on job opportunities and requirements.
3. Cooperation between Government
and private organizations to support and improve educational facilities.
4. Acceptance of responsibility
by management for measures to reduce the impact on workers of technological
change.
5. Public and private support
for retraining of displaced workers, for financial help to such workers
in periods of unemployment, and for protection of their job equities and
security.
6. Improvement of public employment
services.
7. Intensified efforts
to end discriminatory employment practices.
8. Advance planning for short-term
public works projects in possible areas of technological unemployment.
9. Consideration of possible
monetary and fiscal measures, including tax reductions, to stimulate business
and employment.
10. Consideration of possible
reductions in basic work periods.
Incorporated in the report are
dissenting statements by two of the Committee members.