Chairman John Bailey, my friend the Vice President,
Mr. Speaker Rayburn, President Truman, Mrs. Wheeler, Mr. Gardner, Mrs.
Price, fellow Democrats:
It is a great pleasure to be
here, and I want to express my appreciation to the members of the committee
who made this dinner such a success, to all who participated in it: Mrs.
Wheeler, Mr. Gardner - and Stew Udall who handled the publicity [laughter]
- and all the others. I am glad to be here with the Vice President. When
I was away recently, somebody called the White House and said, "I would
like to speak to the President." And they said, "Well, he's in Canada."
"Well, I'd like to speak to the Vice President." And they said, "Well,
he's in Southeast Asia." "Well then, I would like to speak to the Secretary
of State." They said well he was in Geneva. "Well," they said, "who's running
that store?" And the operator said, "The same man who has been running
it for years - Sam Rayburn!"
I must say that I thought one
point in Lyndon's very fine speech, which I think is worthy for us all
to - who are Democrats, and that is, the success of any President of the
United States who has the distinction of being a Democrat is due to the
fact that he is supported by a strong, democratic, progressive party.
Woodrow Wilson once said in
1913, "What good is the success of a political party unless it's used by
the nation for a great national purpose?" And I believe in the administration
of Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, and now today
- the Democratic Party has a great national purpose, to move this country
forward.
I will say on becoming President
that the only thing that really surprised us when we got into office was
that things were just as bad as we had been saying they were; otherwise
we have been enjoying it very much.
In 1783, the first American
official to visit France, Benjamin Franklin, signed in Paris the treaty
declaring that His Britannic Majesty acknowledged the United States to
be free, sovereign, and independent. When we became free, sovereign, and
independent, there was a King of France, a Czar of Russia, an Emperor in
Peking. They've all gone, and this country remains.
Today, 178 years later, I return
to the place where the United States was born, and my trip next week -
the ground for that trip was laid in the administration of a predecessor
of mine, Harry Truman, whose vision and activity in the 1940's helped make
it possible to build a Europe which is our strong ally in difficult days.
I must say I do not go to Europe
in a difficult time in the life of our country with any feeling of historic
inevitability. I suppose when historians come to write about the 1940's
and 1950's with the perspective which history will give them, they will
say that this was a time when the power of the Sino-Soviet bloc increased.
But I think that they will also note an even more remarkable event, and
that is that from 1945 to 1961 was the most extraordinary growth in the
individual liberty of individual countries that the world has ever seen.
And it is my judgment that when the time comes to write the story of the
20th century, the dominant fact will be that liberty grew and spread around
the world.
And that's why I go to Europe,
and with confidence and hope, because the United States is associated with
that great cause.
I do not believe that meetings
between heads of state, either allies or those whose purposes make them
our adversaries, are designed to solve a series of specific problems or
bring about a fundamental change in relationships. For only changes in
the realities which underlie the relations between nations, shifts in power,
the pressure of events, revisions of policies which reflect new needs,
fresh assessments, and the change in power balances within the countries
- only such changes as these leave a permanent mark on the prospects for
peace. Aid while meetings of Presidents and Premiers can sometimes help
in fulfilling such changes, they rarely initiate them.
We do not lack for communication
with France or the Soviet Union, or any other nation. The Vice President
with distinction has carried our message to Southeast Asia in recent days.
The Secretary of State has already met with our allies and adversaries
around the globe. Capable and dedicated Ambassadors maintain a constant
flow of information and judgment between foreign capitals and Washington.
Representatives of nearly all countries work here in the United States.
Nevertheless, meetings of those
who bear the responsibility of leadership in states, viewed as an instrument
of policy and not as a substitute for policy - these meetings can play
a real and helpful role in the quest for peace.
In a fast-moving and revolutionary
world where new crises and threats occur almost daily, where the power
to make decisive and perhaps irrevocable decisions rests in a few hands,
where calculation of how others will react is often a decisive factor in
decisions - in such a world I believe it is indispensable for leaders of
nations to have an understanding of men with whom they must deal.
In addition, there is no real
substitute for the attempt to explore general areas of accommodation and
mutual interest, to ward off danger and clarify intention at the highest
level. And as long as we realize that there is no substitute for the long
and painful process of diplomatic negotiation, necessary to translate general
principles into specific agreements, these meetings can be useful.
Moreover, such meetings are
symbolic. In the case of our allies they symbolize the deep unity of the
Western World, the fixed determination by which we guide our policy, unalterable
under any conditions, to marshal our common strength for the defense of
freedom.
And the meeting with Mr. Khrushchev
is also a symbol: an expression of our intention to leave no path to peace
unexplored, to neglect no opportunity to ease world tensions or to lessen
the dangers into which our adversaries may plunge us and themselves.
Thus I go to Europe, seeking
not solutions to all our problems, but insight into the conditions which
must guide our policies in the coming difficult months. I go as the representative
of the great nation of the United States. I shall tell our allies that
the United States is embarking on an effort to muster the energy and resources
of the strongest nation in history - in the world - in defense of our common
heritage. I shall tell those who do not agree with us that our desire for
peace is matched by our determination to resist all those who seek the
destruction of freedom. And I shall tell the world that here in this country
American men and women are calling forth all the great resources and untapped
power of this country, providing strength for that faith in the freedom
of man which will be the silent guest at every conference table.