Mr. HAROLD OHLENDORF,
President, Arkansas Farm Bureau Federation.
Mr. T. J. HITCH,
President, Tennessee Farm Bureau Federation.
Mr. BOSWELL STEVENS,
President, Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation.
GENTLEMEN: Thank you for your letter of September
21. I'm sorry your letter did not arrive until after my visit to Memphis,
thereby precluding an opportunity to visit with you personally regarding
matters discussed in your letter. However, since we did not have such an
opportunity in Memphis, I appreciate very much that you wrote me and expressed
your suggestions and recommendations dealing with agriculture.
As I have stated on a number of occasions
I believe that the farm problem is the No.1 domestic issue in this campaign.
The farmers of America cannot tolerate 4 more years of the farm policies
which, since 1952 have driven farm prices down 17 percent and net farm
income down 26 percent; and the purchasing power of their income down 29
percent. The farm platform of the Democratic Party is the strongest pledge
ever given to the farmers of America by any political party in history.
I stand behind that pledge and I intend to make good on it beginning next
January.
One of the key points of the Democratic platform
- one in which I deeply believe - is our promise to work with bona fide
farmers and their leaders in developing programs designed to meet the specific
needs and circumstances of each commodity.
We all appreciate the tremendous progess the
cotton industry has made in production practices, in improving quality
and in promoting and developing new uses and new markets. Cotton has a
bright future. With wise action on the part of all who are concerned, the
cotton industry can continue to expand and prosper. A new Democratic administration
will consult closely with cotton producers and their representatives to
develop improved programs to meet needs as they arise.
I believe strongly in the need for a dynamic,
growing national and world economy. I want to see all segments of the Cotton
industry share in the expanded domestic and export markets that will result
from economic growth.
I do not intend to permit the liquidation
of the cotton farmers of the South. I believe that cotton acreage has been
cut far enough. Cotton growers have gone from a top acreage of about 46
million acres before World War II to a planted acreage of somewhat more
than 16 million in 1960.
In recent years, cotton prices were forced
down at the same time acreage was being cut. This intolerable situation
must be stopped and reversed.
Most important of all, the income of the cotton
farmers must be increased to parity levels so that the cottongrower has
an opportunity to earn returns on his labor, investment, and managerial
efforts comparable to the returns received by workers and businessmen in
other industries.
Beginning next January, the new Democratic
administration will work with cotton farmers and their leaders, and with
their Congressmen to develop specific program improvements best suited
to the long-range needs of the cotton industry.
As to the immediate situation, most cotton
farmers and leaders agree we have reached a reasonably satisfactory point
in our supply and carryover situation. I believe most cotton leaders agree
the present carryover of 7 to 8 million bales for the new cotton year is
not out of line.
This has been a remarkable achievement and
one in which cotton farmers and the Democratic Congress have worked hand
in hand to bring about. At the beginning of the 1956 crop year there was
a carryover of 14 million bales. Cotton export sales had been declining
each year, and in the 1955-56 marketing year exports reached the dangerously
low point of 2.2 million bales. This situation was caused by the administration's
refusal to sell American cotton at competitive prices in world markets.
In 1955 the Democratic Congress directed Secretary of Agriculture Benson
to carry out an aggressive export sales program. Then in 1956, because
the Republican administration refused to continue the cotton export program,
the Democratic Congress passed a law specifically directing the Secretary
of Agriculture to sell our cotton at competitive prices.
As a result, while domestic utilization remained
fairly constant, 22 1/2 million bales of American cotton have been exported
in the last 4 years and the carryover has been cut from 14 to less than
8 million bales.
With regard to the situation in wheat, I believe
the program best suited to the specific situation and circumstances in
that commodity should follow the general approach of the program developed
early this year by the National Association of Wheat Growers in cooperation
with other organizations representing producers in the major wheat producing
areas. For other commodities, as in the case of cotton, the Secretary of
Agriculture in a new Democratic administration will work with farmers themselves
to develop commodity programs to meet the special problems of their commodity.
You are right about the need for an expanded
and well-coordinated research program, with major emphasis on developing
new and better uses and markets as well as on reducing production costs
and improving quality and efficient distribution.
I am enclosing a copy of "Agricultural Policy
for the New Frontier," which sets forth what I believe to be desirable
courses of action, or policy guidelines, for agriculture.
Thank you sincerely for your interest and
your thoughtful suggestions. I am confident that with determination and
good will, we can develop satisfactory and effective farm policies to assure
consumers today and in future generations of a secure abundance of food
and fiber, with full parity of opportunity and living standards for farm
people.
Sincerely,