SPEECH BY SENATOR JOHN F. KENNEDY, THE
LITTLE WHITE HOUSE,
WARM SPRINGS, GA., OCTOBER 10, 1960
It is a deep privilege to speak here in Warm
Springs.
No Democrat - and particularly no Democrat
who aspires to be President - can stand on this spot without mingled feelings
of awe and gratitude - awe for the great man who lived here, worked here,
and died here, for the greatness of his works and the greatness of his
soul - and gratitude that he raised a Democratic banner that we can be
proud to raise today - a banner that summons all Americans, in every section,
in every walk of life, in every race and creed.
Franklin Roosevelt was the champion of little
children and the champion of the aged. He understood the needs of the farmer
and the worker, the big city and the small town. His heart went out to
those who were handicapped as he had been, and to those who were poor as
he had never been.
The basic force in all this was not so much
his party or his intellect - it was his spirit - a spirit he breathed into
our National Government - a spirit he breathed into our party - a spirit
which did not die when he died, but must be carried on by those of us who
invoke his name today.
It was a spirit of strength and progress -
to get America moving. And it was a spirit of compassion - not condescension,
but compassion.
It was the compassion of a man who had suffered
deeply himself and who, through his own ordeal, had learned to identify
himself with the suffering of others - the man who said, in accepting his
second nomination in 1936:
Governments can err, Presidents
do make mistakes, but the immortal Dante tells us that Divine Justice weighs
the sins of the coldblooded and the sins of the warmhearted in a different
scale. Better the occasional faults of a government living in the spirit
of charity than the consistent omissions of a government frozen in the
ice of its own indifference.
Franklin Roosevelt knew who had been ignored and
omitted by 12 years of Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover. And he set about
to help them - to remember the forgotten man, to light the farms, to help
the aged, to protect the worker, to open new doors to the Negro, to care
for the needs of millions of Americans in a thousand different ways.
Those who had previously held a monopoly on
the Government's attention denounced the New Deal as the road to socialism
and bankruptcy. They are still making those charges today. But can anyone
here really imagine an America without the New Deal? Can anyone imagine
this Nation without social security, without unemployment compensation
and old-age assistance, without minimum wages and maximum working hours,
without Federal guarantees of collective bargaining, without regulation
of security issues and stock exchanges, without the guarantee of bank deposits,
without protection for our farmers?
There were many conferences on all these programs
held here at Warm Springs. President Roosevelt used to talk about the "spirit
of Warm Springs * * * the general feeling that we are all part of a family."
It was here, for example, that the REA was born - because it was here that
he discovered his electric bill was four times as large as his bill at
Hyde Park - and he realized that rural areas would never get adequate low-cost
electricity unless the Federal Government provided some leadership.
Franklin Roosevelt did not believe Government
was the answer to everything. None of us attaches any magic to dollars
that go to Washington and return, if local and private efforts can do the
job. The conquest of polio - one of F.D.R.'s fondest dreams - is a vivid
testimonial of the work which private research and foundations can do,
backed by Federal funds only where necessary.
But here in Warm Springs, he told a press
conference in 1934 that he was going to continue his fight to help the
needy people of this country " * * * for the very simple reason that if
the Government does not do it nobody else will or can." And even in the
field of health, Franklin Roosevelt was not afraid to pioneer in governmental
efforts wherever he found "nobody else will or can.' He cared greatly about
what he once called "the war against the crippling of our men and women
and, especially, of children."
Illness is a national problem. It recognizes
no barriers of race or religion or region, and its conquest must be a national
effort benefiting all Americans - for the protections of our Government
in every field must be extended without regard to artificial distinctions,
and full participation in our national life must be open to all.
As I have said in every part of the country,
this Nation - if it is to be true to its ideals and obligations - must
assure every citizen full protection of his constitutional rights and his
equal opportunity to participate with every other American in every phase
of our national life.
Franklin Roosevelt's record in the advancement
of health was tremendous. But he would not be content if he felt our concern
today was merely in preserving his accomplishments. F.D.R. was never a
man to rest on the record of the past. He had served in the administration
of Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom. But he knew in 1932 that the New Freedom
was no longer enough - and he moved boldly to the New Deal. And so must
we, in 1960, recognize that there are problems which were not solved or
not even contemplated by the New Deal - and we must boldly move forward
to meet the needs of 1960's new frontiers.
In no area is progress more vitally needed
than the area of health. The cost of medical care has skyrocketed beyond
the reach of many citizens, particularly our older citizens - and yet the
present administration requires them to take a "pauper's oath" before they
can receive assistance. There are too few doctors, too few nurses, and
too few hospitals. Too few of our handicapped are being rehabilitated -
too many medical research projects are financially starved - too many rivers
are dangerously polluted. Drugs are too expensive - insurance plans are
too limited.
Unfortunately these problems have been neglected
for 8 years by a party "frozen in the ice of its own indifference." It's
election year now - and their candidate has come out with a grand new "program
to combat disease in the 1960's." But where was he in the 1950's - when
his party cut back our efforts for TB control, for water-pollution control,
for new hospitals, for medical research, for medical education, for cancer
research, and for services to crippled children? Whatever progress was
made in this field was made by a Democratic Congress over the foot-dragging
opposition of the Republican Party. For him to boast now of the increase
in funds for medical research-funds his party opposed all the way - is
the height of election-year hypocrisy.
But more important than the past is the question:
What do we do now? Anyone who can visit Warm Springs, as I have, will be
reminded that every year we delay will cause unnecessary suffering.
I propose for immediate action the following program for the new frontiers
of health:
First, we must provide a more adequate program
of medical care for the aged - a system which enables a man, during his
working days, to set aside in a trust fund the cost of health insurance
after retirement, so he can receive care then as a matter of right, not
charity - without burdening his children and without taking a humiliating
"pauper's oath."
Second, we must provide Federal grants for
the construction, expansion, and modernization of medical schools, dental
schools, and schools of public health. We are graduating only 7,500 doctors
a year in the entire country - our hospitals and other facilities are under-staffed
- most doctors' offices are overcrowded - and even to maintain the present
ratio, we shall need nearly half again as many by 1975. This will require
at least 20 new schools as well as expanding present facilities - and had
the Republicans not blocked this project in 1955, those schools could be
training new doctors today.
Third, we must provide loans and scholarships
for medical students. There are one-third fewer applicants to our medical
schools today than there were in 1950 - even though the need for their
services is much greater. The reason is that a medical education has become
too expensive for most young people and their parents - nearly $12,000,
not counting the years in undergraduate work before and internship or special
studies afterward. Only 1 out of 10 has any kind of scholarship - and the
average scholarship is only $500. Low-interest loans and fellowships must
be made available by the Federal Government - converting them into scholarships
for those willing to devote their talents to fighting disease in the underdeveloped
nations - for which we need a new World Health Center - and those willing
to devote their talents in this country to those rural and other areas
with a shocking lack of doctors. In some cities, there is a doctor for
every 250 people. In some counties, there is 1 for every 3,000 people.
I think we can do better. We can take these steps to get more doctors -
and more nurses as well.
Fourth, we must provide grants for renovating
our older hospitals. The Hill-Burton Act has been responsible for the construction
of new hospitals with some 200,000 beds. Every year the Republicans try
to cut this appropriation back-and every year the Democrats increase it-70
percent more than the Republicans wanted in the last 3 years. But new hospitals
are not enough. Most of our older cities have older hospitals which could
be renovated, modernized, and expanded to help meet the load - and grants
for this purpose, along with research into improved hospital operation
and administration, could bring the cost and the shortage down at the same
time.
Fifth, we must provide long-term grants for
increased medical research, including basic research. What has already
been accomplished in polio and TB shows what might soon be accomplished
for cancer, mental illness, arteriosclerosis, and new ways of prolonging
man's productive days instead of just prolonging his life. All of this
and more is underway. I am proud that we have resisted each year the Republican
attempts to cut back medical research from the levels recommended by experts.
I am proud to have sponsored the increase in basic research - less dramatic
but equally needed - and the new U.S. Medical Library, which saves time,
money and suffering by helping coordinate research all over the country.
But now we must do more - not only more money, but longer commitments so
that experiments can be planned and equipment bought.
Sixth and finally, we must expand our efforts
for rehabilitation. We see here what can be done. But the tragic fact of
the matter is that for the Nation as a whole, very little is being done.
Two million handicapped or disabled people in America today could be rehabilitated
if the funds and services were available - but instead we are providing
for 88,000. We can do better - we must do better - if we are to live up
to "the spirit of Warm Springs."
This is not a program for socialized medicine
- it is a program to prevent socialized medicine, by meeting our critical
needs in a manner consistent with our obligation to freedom and the doctor's
obligation to humanity. In meeting these problems - as in meeting all the
problems that press in upon us in the sixties, problems of falling farm
income, unemployment, race relations, housing, education, and, above all,
problems of war and peace - our task is not light. Our responsibilities
are many. Our crities will be strong.
But I ask you to remember that, here at Warm
Springs, they found among Franklin Roosevelt's papers a speech he had written
but never delivered - and it closed with these words:
The only limit to our realization of tomorrow
will be our doubts of today. Let us move forward with strong and active
faith.