Senator KENNEDY. Governor Combs, Lt. Gov. Wilson
Wyatt, Governor Clements, Governor Wetherby, Keen Johnson, your next U.S.
Senator from the State of Kentucky [applause], Congressman Natcher, who
runs like we would all like to run, uncontested [applause], Congressman
Frank Chelf - we flew over his district - they were down there waving at
us [laughter], ladies and gentlemen, I want to give you the best two-horse
parlay in the State of Kentucky today. That is Western Kentucky State College
in the winter and the Democratic Party in November. [Applause.]
I am delighted to be in this community with
two distinguished colleges and universities, a center of education and
where there is a look to the future. Prince Bismarck once said that one-third
of the students of German universities broke down from overwork, another
third broke down from dissipation, and the other third ruled Germany. I
do not know which third of the student body of Bowling Green Business University
or Western Kentucky is here today, which third of the student body is here
today, but I am confident that I am talking to the future rulers of America.
[Applause.] In the sense that all educated citizens participate in the
discipline of self-government.
I come today as a candidate for the Democratic
Party. The Democratic Party, which is the only national party in the United
States [applause] and which was founded when Thomas Jefferson and James
Madison went up in the early part of the 19th century, traveled up the
Hudson River on a botanical expedition, hunting butterflies and catching
fish, and they came down the Hudson River and they stopped in New York
and met Aaron Burr and the knights of Tammany, and founded the coalition
which then developed between the rural South and the industrial North.
That tradition has been maintained to the present day.
I come today from Massachusetts, not hunting
butterflies, but asking Kentucky to rejoin the Democratic Party. [Applause.]
Here in this State which has been represented by great Democratic Senators
in the past, which sent Fred Vinson to the Senate, which sent Alben Barkley
to the Vice Presidency, I believe in 1960, Kentucky and the country are
going to say "Yes" to the future, "Yes" to the Democratic Party. [Applause.]
The history of this country moves in rhythms,
back and forth, between progress and standing still, between liberalism
and conservation, and I believe in 1960 the choice for the United States
is forward. I cannot believe that in the most revolutionary age that the
world has ever known, in science, technology, in outer space, in the minds
of men around the globe, I cannot believe that the American people are
going to give their endorsement to a political party which says, "You have
never had it so good," which endorses the status quo, which endorses the
past, which says that everything that is necessary to be done is being
done. I cannot believe that the American people will not say that in these
changing times, in these times of revolution, in these times of forward
motion around the world - I believe that the Democratic Party is best suited
to lead in those times. [Applause.]
I believe the record is clear. No democratic
candidate for the Presidency ever said that party labels are unimportant.
Every Republican candidate every 4 years says, "Don't pay any attention
to the record of our parties." No Democratic President ever called TVA
"creeping socialism." [Applause.] No Democratic President ever ran
on a record of repealing social security. No Democratic President ever
vetoed a tobacco bill. [Applause.] No Democratic President in this century
has presided over the temporary liquidation of American agriculture which
has seen a drop in corn in the last 8 years of nearly 30 percent, which
has seen livestock go down 23 percent in the last 8 years, and which puts
forward an agricultural program, a complete
repetition of Mr. Benson - and why not. Nixon called Mr. Benson the
most remarkable Secretary of Agriculture in the history of the United States.
(Response from the audience.)
Senator KENNEDY. And I must agree. He has
spent more money than any Secretary of Agriculture, or all of them, in
the history of the United States. He has piled up higher surpluses. He
has dropped farmers income more sharply and after 8 years in office he
still blames it on the Democrats. He is the most remarkable Secretary
of Agriculture in history. But I cannot believe that this country is going
to give their endorsement to a program which continues Mr. Benson's policy
of tying the support price on agricultural commodities, tying the support
price to the market price of the last 8 years, which will provide a steady
drop in agricultural income. This is a serious time, and I believe that
the United States if it is to meet its manifest destiny, must build its
strength here at home.
The reason that Franklin Roosevelt was a good
neighbor in Latin America was because he was a good neighbor in the United
States. And I know of no better example of the partnership which can exist
between local groups and States and the National Government than the development
of the Tennessee Valley, and I do not know any project in this long history
of ours that has had a more lasting effect all over the globe, in eastern
Persia, in the Indus River, in the country of Colombia, in South America
- every country now is trying to duplicate what the Tennessee Valley did.
And it is a source of satisfaction to me that the Tennessee Valley received
its greatest impetus in the twenties not from a man who represented the
people of this area, but from George Norris and the State of Nebraska,
1,000 miles away, who recognized the national interest, who put the Tennessee
Valley, with Franklin Roosevelt and the rest, in over the opposition of
the Republican Party and built this valley until it is now one of the richest
in the Nation. [Applause.]
I say that party labels do mean something,
if the party stands for something. No political party is of any use to
the people, nor is any politician if he does not stand for definite principles
and the principles that I stand for in this century are the same principles
that Woodrow Wilson stood for in 1912, and which Franklin Roosevelt stood
for in 1932, and which President Truman campaigned on in 1948, and my judgment
is that their success abroad, the success of the foreign policies of those
three Presidents, were directly tied to the success of their policies here
in the United States. The 14 points of Woodrow Wilson were tied to the
new freedom of Woodrow Wilson. The good neighbor policy was tied to the
New Deal. And the Marshall plan, NATO and the Truman doctrine and point
4 all had their domestic counterpart in the efforts which President Truman
made to lift our country forward.
I come in the most somber time in the history
of our country, when in 1960 our steel production is at 54 of capacity.
Last week the Soviet Union outproduced the United States in steel capacity,
with one-half of our potential. By 1975 the Soviet Union will be equal
to the United States in hydrocapacity, and 10 years ago they were about
a third of us. By 1980, according to Allen Dulles, of the CIA, if the present
rate of economic growth continues, and theirs is from two to three times
as great as ours, by 1980 the lines will cross, and unless we begin to
move ahead at a faster rate, they will begin to outproduce us.
Today they produce about 44 p ercent of what
we produce, and yet they maintain a Communist defensive, a great military
power, and increasing their power in Africa, Asia and Latin America. I
come as a citizen of the United States and say that what we are doing is
not good enough. It is my responsibility as leader of the opposition party
in 1960 to state that the decision which the American people will make
in 1960 is between a political party which looking at the world around
us and at our country says it is good enough, and a political party looking
at the world around us and our own country which says it is not good enough.
Our effort is not good enough. We are not moving ahead fast enough. We
are not building our strength in relation to that of the Communists with
sufficient vigor. That is a decision which you as voters of the State of
Kentucky will have to address yourselves to, to which party, to which political
philosophy, to which viewpoint, do you believe, after making your own careful
judgment?
This is not a view of mine. It has been expressed
by commission after commission appointed in the last 8 years, by distinguished
Republican after distinguished Republican, by general after general, who
has warned that the relative power of the United States and of the free
world is not rising as fast as it must, if we are to maintain ourselves
and the cause of freedom around the globe.
I take no pleasure in this message. Whether
I win or lose, however, this message is going to be given, that what we
are doing now is not good enough, that this is a strong country which must
be stronger. It is a powerful country which must be more powerful, and
it is on your judgment and your sense of responsibility, and your willingness
to face the future which is looming in front of us, in a crowded and turbulent
world, it is on the good judgment of the people of Kentucky that I rest
my case. I believe as in other days and other years, in other great crises,
that the Democratic Party, old as it is, stretching back in history as
it does, I believe it is the most vigorous, the most modern, the most up
to date, the most vital, the most in touch with the changing world around
us. So I come here today and ask your support. I ask your support not only
for our candidates, but I ask your support and your enlistment in the great
cause of building the strength of the great Republic. Thank you. [Applause.]